Skip to main content

How Changing Media Shaped History and Societies

We are in the middle of a new AI revolution that is going to change media forever. This could give a push to the saturating and plateaued social media. It could also make it even more difficult to reach a wider audience due to higher competition.

To contemplate and guess what may happen, we must understand how changing media changed societies and civilizations. It does three things – unites a type of people, divides or polarizes a group, democratizes a previous media system, and makes content more local, but reduces wider reach.


Creation of Insiders, but also Outsiders
 

Invention of Languages

When early humans invented languages, they became more organized and developed tribes and societies. But this also clearly defined the concept of an ‘insider’ and ‘outsider’. When they came in contact with tribes which didn’t speak their languages, the idea of insider and outsider became clearer. This also led to clashes and cultural feuds.

 

Invention of Writing Systems

When languages were written down, transactions were recorded, the economy was standardized, laws were clearly defined, and faith and belief systems became codified as religions. This created a sense of common civilization but also created a differentiation from those who were outside of the civilization. Humans were united and divided again.

 

Democratizing Writings

When literacy and religious texts were written down in a particular classical language that became the monopoly of the elites, the common folk became alienated from this culture. Local languages replaced these elite languages in the society and led to reformation within the religion and literary culture. This brought the common folk together and differentiated the mass culture from the elitist culture. This slowly led to a social renaissance and at places, even revolution against the elites. Common folks united but separated against elites within their society.

 

Invention of the Printing Press

In a society, social messages were limited to religious texts and administrative documentation. But after the invention of the printing press, not only did these texts reach a wider audience, but they also democratized social communications through novels, philosophical writings and newspapers. People who spoke and understood the same languages came closer more than ever, irrespective of social class because their media influences were common.

 

But it also divorced them from those who didn’t speak the same language. The idea of Nation-States arose, which had language and linguistic ethnicity as an important factor for nationhood. Multilingual empires collapsed, while regions speaking a common language united as a nation. It also became a tool for propaganda that gave rise to world wars.

 

Invention of Film & Radio

The invention of the telegram, the radio, and the camera, led to breakthroughs in mass communication and made the world closer. But soon, political narrative developed and ideologies spread across societies dividing them based on where they stood socially and economically.


Entertainment business boomed, which was once limited to theatre and books. Content diversified to meet the audience’s demands. But even here, content for the masses was different from content for niche audiences catered by independent filmmakers.

 

Invention of Cable Television

The emergence of cable networks led to many television channels that competed for the audience’s attention. Along with entertainment channels, news channels came into existence. Together, they reduced the dominance of older mediums like films and newspapers. Like always, pandering to a particular type of audience developed.

 

Invention of Social Media

Till now, all the mediums were one-sided. There was a clear distinction between the creators and audiences, and there was no accurate way to measure people’s responses. But after the emergence of Social Media, every individual could now respond to everything in real-time. Smartphones turned every audience into creators, breaking the monopoly of studios.

 

However, algorithms developed to cater to what people wanted led to echo chambers, deeper political propaganda, and the development of confirmation biases. Now ‘insiders and outsiders’ were at all levels – pop culture fanbase, celebrity fan club, ideological leaning, social identities, and so on. It alienated people with differences of opinion and led to 'cancel culture' and social boycotts.

 

It also created a clutter of content, both good and bad. This made it even more difficult for a creator to reach a very wide audience like television, film, radio, and newspapers once did. The market became fragmented into niches. This is the highest level of overlapping insiders and outsiders.

 

AI in Social Media

The rise of artificial intelligence will make it more democratic to create and will further blur the difference between the creator and the audience. But with so many more content clutters, the niche would be smaller. To cater for these smaller niches, the content has to be more tailored.


Artificial Intelligence would make translations easier breaking the language barrier. This would bring two people from different countries together, but it would also separate neighbours with different preferences.

 

Wider Reach but Smaller Circle

When language and writing systems developed, it was easier to influence an entire civilization, nation and culture. But when these old languages faded and local languages took centre stage after the printing press and other mass media, the circle of influence became limited to a particular nation or linguistic group. But when that percolated deeper, social groups within a nation and linguistic groups were divided. The rise of social media is making these social circles even smaller. While “mass” media will still exist, its impact will be limited.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Speculative Hindu Temple Architecture: Modern style

India has a wonderful variety of Hindu temple architectures. Each style evolved from previous one during a particular era and under a particular cultural influence. But after colonial period, the style stopped evolving further and all later modern temples we see today have borrowed heavily from the styles that existed before. Although there are a few hipster styles today, but still it’s little bland if you compare it with the kind of architectures that existed before. So, how would’ve been Hindu temple architecture of today’s India if we follow its pattern? But first let’s check out all types of Hindu temple architecture styles in India and abroad. You definitely must be aware of the most common styles – the north Indian ‘Nagara’, the south Indian ‘Dravida’, and its blend known as ‘Vessara’. But there are many regional styles which often get unnoticed by the common folk. Let’s check them out. Types of Hindu Temple Architecture Early Nagara Shikhara with Gavaksha Dravida Vimana Vessar...

Indian Festival(s): Diwali

Diwali also known as Dipavali, which is festival of lights. Although the present scenario in cities of modern India (@least in Mumbai) contradicts the meaning of the festival. The festival of lights is celebrated as festival of noise. Fireworks were used as they gave lights, which were followed by bombs & other crackers which gives 2% light, 48% smoke and 50% noise. It seems like the main intention of celebrating a festival is to trouble people around. Many people have asthma problems; many people mostly due to old age have timid ears and can even get a heart attack after listening the kaboom noise of the crackers. Even during marriages and Ganpati visarjan , traffic jam and making loud noise with weird dances on the streets are common. They don't care if an ambulance have to pass by or if there is hospital in that area.  Indian festivals have now became the best examples of mockery. Festivals are celebrated by troubling other people. Not ju...

Ethnic Nationalism

A lot is heard about ethnic based separatist movements, like people of a particular region in a country having issues with people of other regions within the country. Most of the reasons are ethnic or cultural and the demands range from territorial autonomy to complete independence. Why does it happen? Well for that we have to go back in history. During the age of empires, the political boundaries were not limited to the cultural boundaries but depended on the ruler's imperial capacities. For examples: Maratha Empire had conquered and ruled states like Gujarat and Central India which were culturally distinct. The French Empire ruled Italy and Spain. The Japanese Empire briefly ruled nations in South East Asia and Korea. The British, well their rule was in every continent of the world. When concept of Nation-State emerged, it started changing political boundaries. Most common factor was language; kingdoms like Prussia, Saxony, Bavaria etc. joined to form Germany, as they a...